Diesel Fuel Lab provides cetane improver testing — laboratory verification of diesel fuel cetane number before and after cetane-improving additive treatment, using ASTM D613 (the engine-based cetane test) and modern constant-volume combustion chamber methods that actually detect additive response. Our testing is conducted through Sterling Analytical, serving fuel blenders, distributors, additive manufacturers, fleet operators, and anyone who needs documented confirmation that a cetane improver treatment achieved its target.
Before going further: if you’re researching cetane testing, the single most important fact to understand upfront is the distinction between cetane number and cetane index — because it determines whether the test you run will detect cetane improver performance at all. Getting this wrong means paying for a test that can’t answer the question you’re actually asking.
Cetane number and cetane index are both used to describe diesel fuel ignition quality. They are not interchangeable, and for cetane improver testing, only one of them works.
Cetane number (measured by ASTM D613, or estimated by constant-volume combustion chamber methods) is a direct measurement of a fuel’s actual ignition quality. ASTM D613 runs the fuel in a standardized single-cylinder diesel test engine under specified conditions, measures the ignition delay, and compares the result to reference fuels with known cetane numbers. What this test measures is real ignition behavior — including the response to any cetane-improving additives present in the fuel.
Cetane index (calculated by ASTM D976 or ASTM D4737) is a mathematical calculation based on fuel density and distillation characteristics — physical properties that reflect the base fuel’s hydrocarbon composition. It does not involve running the fuel. It does not measure ignition. And — this is the critical point — cetane index is not affected by cetane improvers. Adding 2-EHN (2-ethylhexyl nitrate), the most common cetane improving chemistry, at effective treatment rates raises the fuel’s cetane number measurably. The fuel’s density and distillation profile don’t change. The calculated cetane index stays the same.
This is explicitly acknowledged in ASTM technical guidance: cetane index does not respond to cetane improver additives. A fuel blender who adds cetane improver and then tests only cetane index to verify treatment efficacy is running a test that cannot detect what they’re trying to measure. They would get the same calculated cetane index regardless of whether the additive was present or absent.
For cetane improver testing, cetane number by ASTM D613 (or an equivalent engine or combustion chamber method) is the required test. Cetane index is not a substitute.
Cetane number is a measure of a diesel fuel’s ignition quality — specifically, how readily the fuel self-ignites when injected into a hot compressed air charge in a diesel engine cylinder. Unlike a gasoline engine that uses a spark plug to initiate combustion, a diesel engine relies entirely on the heat of compressed air to ignite the injected fuel. The cetane number measures how well a specific fuel performs this compression ignition.
The consequences of low cetane (below 40) are documented and real:
ASTM D975 sets the minimum cetane number at 40 for No. 1-D and 2-D diesel fuel grades. Typical commercial ULSD in the United States runs in the 42–45 cetane range. Premium and renewable diesel formulations can reach 50–55 or higher.
The consequences of low cetane (below 40) are documented and real:
Several of these consequences — particularly hard cold starts and rough idle — can appear in fuel that technically passes ASTM D975’s minimum cetane requirement of 40, depending on engine design, ambient temperature, and specific engine operating conditions. Many diesel engine manufacturers specify a higher minimum cetane than the D975 floor to protect their warranty and performance claims.
Understanding why cetane improvers are commonly used in modern diesel production connects directly to the same ULSD chemistry change discussed throughout this site.
The hydrotreating process that removes sulfur to produce ULSD also removes aromatic hydrocarbons — specifically polycyclic aromatic compounds — that contributed to natural ignition quality in older diesel formulations. Aromatics generally have lower cetane numbers than paraffins; removing them should, in principle, improve cetane. But the catalytic cracking processes used alongside hydrotreating to maximize refinery yield produce hydrocarbon fractions with less predictable ignition quality than straight-run distillate.
The net result is that ULSD cetane is less predictable batch-to-batch than older diesel formulations, and certain crude oil sources and refinery configurations produce ULSD that comes in near or at the D975 minimum. Cetane improver addition — typically 2-EHN (2-ethylhexyl nitrate) at concentrations around 1,000 ppm in practice — is used to bring borderline-cetane ULSD to specification or to achieve above-specification targets for premium diesel products.
2-EHN (2-ethylhexyl nitrate) is the most widely used cetane improving additive chemistry for diesel fuels. Understanding how it works explains why it raises cetane number without affecting cetane index:
2-EHN decomposes thermally in the hot compressed air charge before fuel injection begins, producing highly reactive radical species — nitrogen dioxide being the most important — that accelerate the oxidation chain reactions that initiate auto-ignition. The fuel itself doesn’t change; instead, the presence of reactive species in the combustion chamber environment shortens the apparent ignition delay of the fuel. Because cetane index is calculated from the fuel’s physical properties (density and distillation), and 2-EHN addition doesn’t change those properties at effective treatment concentrations, cetane index is completely blind to this mechanism.
This chemistry also explains the dose-response behavior: at typical treatment concentrations around 1,000 ppm, 2-EHN typically raises cetane number by 3–6 units depending on the base fuel. The response is not perfectly linear — diminishing returns apply at higher concentrations, and response varies with base fuel aromatic content, with higher-aromatic fuels showing somewhat different response curves than lower-aromatic ULSD. Before-and-after laboratory testing is the only way to confirm what a specific additive treatment achieved on a specific base fuel — calculated cetane index cannot predict or confirm it.
The reference method: a standardized single-cylinder CFR diesel engine operated under defined conditions with the ignition timing adjusted until the defined ignition delay is achieved, then compared to reference fuel blends. D613 is the primary cetane number standard for specification compliance and the definitive method when cetane improver response must be measured. It is also the most resource-intensive method — running an engine test takes time and requires specialized equipment.
A mathematical calculation from density, and distillation temperatures at 10%, 50%, and 90% recovery. More accurate than the older 2-point method (ASTM D976, which overestimates cetane index and is no longer recommended). Useful for screening base fuel cetane quality from physical properties. Does not detect cetane improver response. Not appropriate for before/after cetane improver verification.
The older, simpler calculation using only density and the 50% distillation temperature. Noted in technical guidance as overestimating cetane index relative to other methods. Not recommended for accurate cetane index calculation. Does not detect cetane improver response.
Newer-generation methods using a constant-volume combustion chamber rather than a running engine to measure fuel ignition characteristics. Faster and less resource-intensive than the D613 engine test. The AFIDA (Advanced Fuel Ignition Delay Analyzer) uses the same primary reference fuels as D613 and provides a calibrated cetane number result with direct correlation to D613 results (R² = 0.98 in inter-laboratory validation studies). These methods do detect cetane improver response — unlike calculated cetane index, they measure actual ignition behavior including additive effects. An investigation into carryover with 2-EHN confirmed no cross-contamination effects in AFIDA testing.
For cetane improver verification, either D613 or a validated constant-volume combustion chamber method (D7668, D8183) is appropriate. Both detect additive response. Calculated cetane index (D976, D4737) is not appropriate.
Fuel blenders adding cetane improver to bring a base fuel batch to specification or to a premium cetane target need documented proof that the intended cetane was achieved. Before-and-after testing (base fuel without additive, then after treatment) establishes both the baseline and the achieved cetane number.
Additive manufacturers and distributors need to demonstrate what a specific cetane improver product achieves on a specific base fuel at a specific dose. Laboratory testing with D613 or AFIDA provides the quantitative data — cetane units gained per 1,000 ppm of additive — that characterizes product performance.
Fleets operating in cold climates, at high altitude, or with modern engines that specify cetane above the ASTM D975 minimum of 40 need to verify incoming fuel meets their cetane requirement. For premium diesel products claiming enhanced cetane, laboratory cetane number verification confirms the claim independently of the supplier’s Certificate of Analysis.
When diesel equipment experiences repeated hard cold starts, rough idle, or combustion noise consistent with low cetane, laboratory cetane number testing (not cetane index) establishes whether the fuel is contributing to the problem. Fuel at cetane 40–42 that meets specification minimum may still be insufficient for specific engine designs or cold-weather conditions that a particular operation requires higher cetane for.
Renewable diesel (HVO/hydrotreated vegetable oil) routinely achieves cetane numbers in the 70–90 range — well above conventional diesel. Biodiesel (FAME) typically achieves 47–55. When qualifying renewable or biodiesel blends against application requirements, cetane number testing documents actual ignition quality against both base diesel minimum and any higher application-specific requirements.
The most informative testing program for cetane improver verification involves paired samples:
This before/after protocol documents three things simultaneously: the base fuel cetane quality, the additive treatment response on that specific fuel, and the achieved final cetane number after treatment — the complete picture needed for batch release, quality claims, or specification compliance documentation.
Additional parameters often tested alongside cetane number for complete batch qualification include sulfur content (ASTM D5453 for ULSD compliance), flash point (ASTM D93), water and sediment (ASTM D2709), and API gravity (ASTM D1298) — the standard ASTM D975 screening panel.
Fuel distributors and rack terminal operators blending cetane improver into diesel to meet customer specifications or premium product claims, using before/after testing to document achieved cetane
Additive manufacturers and product developers characterizing cetane response data for new or existing cetane improving products across different base fuel types.
Independent quality inspectors verifying that a supplier’s premium diesel product achieves the cetane claim on the Certificate of Analysis, using independent D613 or equivalent testing rather than calculated cetane index alone.
Government and procurement agencies establishing defensible quality specifications for diesel fuel purchases requiring cetane above the D975 minimum.
Standard turnaround: 5–7 business days (cetane engine test scheduling). Rush service available; contact us for availability.
Testing conducted through Sterling Analytical, established 1957, West Springfield, Massachusetts. Visit sterlinganalytical.com →
Terminal fuel quality problems can affect thousands of gallons of product and multiple downstream customers before they’re detected. Whether you need incoming receipt verification, storage tank monitoring, outgoing certification testing, or contamination event investigation, our laboratory team can recommend the appropriate ASTM testing program for your terminal operation.
